Choosing the proper flight controller is one of the most important choices you can make while developing or updating your drone. The APM 2.8 and Pixhawk 2.4.8 PX4 32 Bit Flight Controllers are two well-liked alternatives that frequently come up in this conversation. To assist you in determining which flight controller best meets your needs, let's compare these two.

APM 2.8 Flight Controller


  1. Cost-Effective: The APM 2.8 is budget-friendly, making it an excellent choice for beginners and those on a tight budget.
  2. Stable and Reliable: It offers stable flight performance and has been around for a while, gaining a reputation for reliability.
  3. Wide Community Support: The APM community is active and can provide valuable guidance and support.


  1. Limited Processing Power: APM 2.8 has limited processing capabilities compared to newer controllers, which can restrict the complexity of your drone's functions.
  2. Older Technology: It's not as cutting-edge as more modern controllers, so it may lack some of the advanced features found in newer models.

Pixhawk 2.4.8 PX4 32 Bit Flight Controller


  1. High Performance: The Pixhawk 2.4.8 boasts a powerful 32-bit processor, providing more computational capacity for advanced flight features.
  2. Modular Design: It's designed with modularity in mind, allowing you to customize your drone with various sensors and peripherals.
  3. Wide Compatibility: The PX4 firmware is widely supported by the open-source community, ensuring access to updates and extensive documentation.


  1. Higher Cost: Pixhawk 2.4.8 tends to be more expensive than the APM 2.8, which might not be ideal for those on a tight budget.
  2. Steep Learning Curve: The increased functionality can make it more challenging for beginners to set up and configure.

Making a Decision

APM 2.8 or Pixhawk 2.4.8 should be chosen based on your project's complexity, budget, and level of experience. The APM 2.8 might work well if you're just getting started and are looking for a cheap way to create a simple drone. The Pixhawk 2.4.8, on the other hand, would be a better option if you're searching for a controller with more processing power and room for extension to build a high-performance drone.

In summary, Pixhawk 2.4.8 offers extensive features for those willing to spend in more complex drone applications, whereas APM 2.8 is a dependable and affordable choice for straightforward projects

Before selecting a choice, carefully consider your objectives and spending limit. Also, keep in mind that each controller has a distinct advantage to give in the field of drone construction and operation.